Steve Morris and Carl Hobbs, case dismissed insufficient evidence, where is the justice!



Carl Hobbs showed my wife his dismissal for his contempt proceeding in the 185th.  Checked off on the dismissal was insufficient evidence as the reason, to bad there is not a category for no evidence.  I know Carl, and he is a great guy and no one had their reputations dragged through the mud more than he and Steve Morris.  When this happened it was on the front page of the paper and Ted Oberg was insinuating Carl and Steve were the Watergate burglars based on his coverage.  The facts are that it was a completely bogus show cause order written by a very politically biased Judge.  And, now you have to ask yourself why was this done and it brings us back full circle on the runaway 185th Grand Jury.

Carl and Steve desperately tried to protect the integrity of the grand jury.  These men tried to stop the corruption of what was about to take place.  See to make Anderson’s smear job work Judge Susan Brown, Judge Marc Brown and Mike Anderson had to remove the prosecutors from the room.  There was simply no other way they could perpetuate the corruption with honest men present.  I have always found it more than coincidental that Judge Marc Brown appeared before his own wife’s Grand Jury, and Shazam Stephen St. Martin and Jim Mount were appointed the special prosecutors for the 185th grand jury.  You have to include Billy Belk in the scheme.  He was the investigator hired by St. Martin and Mount. Belk works out of Rusty Hardin’s office.  Yes, that guy who was on the host committee for Mike Anderson’s fundraiser.  Now we know the whole thing was bogus from the get go.  Carl and Steve were entirely correct in their actions and so you are left with the purpose of the 185th Grand Jury or lack thereof.   These men tried to protect my wife, the residents of Harris County, and the DA’s office from the corruption that is Mike Anderson’s campaign.

Judge Susan Brown sought to recuse herself from this hearing after the problems were pointed out to her concerning the show cause order, smart.  I found it ironic that time was of the essence to get a Judge appointed to hear Rachel’s recusal, it was done within a couple of hours.  Carl and Steve had to wait months and the timing fell on the day before super Tuesday.  It is funny and I kept kidding Carl that he would never have his hearing and if he did it would be after the election, Murray write that down, Don was wrong.  Mike Anderson will always blame his loss on the delayed primary, thank you redistricting and a few Judges in San Antonio.   So the question remains will the Judicial Conduct Review Committee hold Judge Susan Brown accoutable for her actions. There was nothing in the show cause order that she wrote that was correct or true, well she may have gotten her court right?  Brad Beers represented the court reporters, Randy Schaffer represented Steve Morris and, Bill Hawkins represented Carl Hobbs.  All the lawyers staunchly defended the innocence of their clients and would not be bullied by Susan Brown.  All demanded a hearing for their clients.  Funny how God does not ugly or corruption.  Congratulations to all four and thank you for trying to protect Rachel.  You all are good honorable people who every day go to the Harris County Criminal Court House and give it your all.  Carl and Steve are part of the crowd at the DA’s office who lose sleep over the thought they may put an innocent person in jail.  Mike Anderson, Stephen St. Martin, Jim Mount, Billy Belk, Murray Newman, Luci Davidson, Brad Hart, and Kristen Guinney do not fall into the category and are sleeping like babies with innocent people going to jail.

I can’t decide which photo I like better of Mike Anderson, with or without the mustache.  Please let me know which one you think is best.  I kind of like the RosenthaI as I call it that I used in the last post, but I have noticed quite of few Anderson supporters have shaved theirs?

 

Murray Newman and Brad Hart (Updated)

I am wondering if Murray Newman realizes why it is a bad, very bad idea to post peoples divorce records on the internet.  Murray I will allow you to comment why this was a terrible idea and I want you to think it through very carefully before you respond.  Brad you can have a shot at it too.

(Update) It is real hard not to take many of the comments and just put them out there.  I will say that when you have someone posting divorce records and comments from X’s it is very hurtful to the families.  Murray is a punk for doing it but it does not mean that I will, however, does Brad deserve a pass?  He is a poor lawyer with evidently poorer judgement and wants to be a judge.  I find it funny that Jessica Colon represents Brad and is burning up the site.  Jessica, next time you have a client and you post negative comments on a site, you may want to ask yourself where does that information go?  Will this person maintain his hard drive, will the hard drive wind up in other hands?  I got to tell you it has been a real eye opener those questions I just mentioned.  There is a lesson for all anonymous posters out there.